Originally Posted by jeffandnicole

So they shouldn't have sold the room to begin with. Or maybe it was an emergency construction project. Maybe you all missed a recent post saying how someone got walked (actually, just had their room cancelled) and he's upset they're putting him in a hotel 20 miles away. If no other rooms were available at this hotel, would that have been an acceptable alternative?

What if they moved the person to a hotel across the street? That would still anger some people. Or what if they comped their entire stay, but they needed access to their room at 2pm...does the lack of money help with the fact they can't use their room?

I'm always amazed at the sheer lack of thought of some people here. Yeah, it may be inconvenient not to have access to the room, but at least they're telling the person in advance, and providing *something* for the inconvenience. Some of you act like it should be winning the lottery and they just hand over whatever you demand.

And I wonder if those that demand the name of the hotel run some sort of list to never visit those hotels. I would think after a while you might as well start staying in Motel 6s...because those are going to be the only hotels not on your list.