FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Design the new process to solve IVDB (a constructive, positive thread)
Old Apr 17, 2017 | 4:59 pm
  #170  
Loose Cannon
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Let me check my Logbook
Programs: Southwest Rapid Rewards; AAdvantage; Alaska Mileage Plan; Wyndham Rewards; Choice Hotels
Posts: 2,406
Originally Posted by exwannabe
On the first point, as a practical issue, this is now almost certainly the case.

On the second, I am not sure what you are saying. IDB comp is neither a floor nor a cap, it is a set amount owed if you are forced off, The "cap" issue has to do with VDBs, where you offer to get off for some compensation. That is a negotiated deal between the parties, and there should be no reason for DOT to be involved.

There is no DOT cap on this, airlines can pay whatever.

And a floor would be bad. If I want to accept a modest VDB to get on a flight that is better for me, why should I be barred from this option? Instead you suggest the airline and I can not make a mutually beneficial deal.
IDB has a set amount of either 2x to max of 675$ or 4x fare to max of 1350$ depending on length of delay. I'd like to see a floor of 675$ or 1350$ adjusted each year for inflation. That is for IDB not VDB.

If you want to go for a modest VDB (not IDB) not a problem that's between you and the airline.
Loose Cannon is offline