Originally Posted by
wcaldog
Something in the LA Times article caught my attention ..."battered against an arm rest and dragged off the plane after he refused to give up his seat to
an off-duty United employee." Were these "off-duty employees" the same term as employees that have to work the next day or were they truly off-duty employees that just wanted to go home??? Are we 100% sure passengers were kicked out for attendants that had to work the next day or was it the gate agent trying to get his or her friend home and screw a paying passenger? I don't know the answer.
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-f...413-story.html
About 1000+ posts on this thread is based on United partner acting "for the greater good" (sic) and those employees while off-duty at that moment were needed to operate a flight at Louisville.
Even if that is not rue, how does it change the narrative of the bigger picture
a) IDB needs to stop
b) LEO brutality need to stop
c) Victim blamingshameful mentality need to stop