FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is it fair that the lowest fare/no status pax is at the top of the IDB list?
Old Apr 15, 2017 | 3:18 pm
  #36  
floridastorm
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by Northern Canuck
Yet another way for them to make money other than selling you a ticket. Next will be a premium to make sure your luggage makes it to your destination the day you do or maybe weigh you in before boarding and you pay if you are overweight or what about a charge to use the lav on flights less than 2 hours... It goes on and on. I agree AC has shown that it chooses to nickle and dime its passengers to the point that passengers are fed up. Time for the government to step in as has happened in other countries, even the States.
What is the point of charging passengers for overweight luggage and not charging passengers for being overweight. Why should a 90 lb, 5' 2" woman pay the same fare as a 300 lb, 6' 5" man? I'm quite sure that the 210 lb difference is many times that of the overweight luggage. It's all the same to the stress on the air frame and engines.
floridastorm is offline