The A321 has a 7" wider cabin which makes a world of difference.
On the flipside DL's A321's also have overhead bins that are horribly designed.
Originally Posted by
ChiefNWA
But I can't help but laugh everytime I read about the lav problem. I've seen posts about people that refuse to fly the plane or will make extra connections in order to avoid it because of the lavatory size, which is unbelievable. I get in there and get my business done, no fooling around. I don't need or expect a 75 sq ft lavatory on a domestic plane.
The lav is definitely tight, but I think to myself "Would I be willing to pay even one penny more in airfare for a larger lav and the answer is no ... and I'm not a small guy.
Originally Posted by
Keith2004
Im missing the 757s already
I wish their was a 3rd narrow option at this size or in general
Aside from the CS100 the next 30 years are 320 family and 737 family
I've never thought there was anything particularly great about the 757 other than they used to have more FC seats and they often board from 2L which is nice when you're in first.
Originally Posted by
rylan
F seats are tight when pax in front reclines
I find every narrowbody aircraft to be tight in F when the passenger in front reclines
Originally Posted by
rylan
the overheads are not that good.
They're better than what DL installed on the A321's.