Originally Posted by
Kacee
Well the abstract question is how would a court interpret that term as it's used in the CoC. Not how it was used in a UA press release. I think the CoC is going to be interpreted in light of industry usage.
Take a look at your BP next time you fly. It tells you when "boarding" starts and when it ends. That's the industry usage, and I would wager that most passengers are generally familiar with that usage.
Now it may be prudent to IDB pax before they've taken their seats, but the airline has a very good argument that "boarding" doesn't end until the GA closes the flight and/or the boarding door.
Not to quibble with you, but isn't the language of the CoC ambiguous enough in this regard it could be challenged successfully?