Originally Posted by
Oldtiger
In July last year, following the removal of the tigers from the temple,it was reported that the temple had massively encroached on forestry land and that the government had used Sec. 44 to reclaim the land and ordering many structures to be demolished. So how come they have managed to build a zoo on the land which was supposedly taken back?
I didn't see anything which indicated to me that the new temple is located on the same land which was taken back.