Originally Posted by SPN Lifer
<snip> to the level, perhaps, that (temporarily?) cost the prickly Christian from Arizona his posting privileges.
. . . Indeed, it would appear that the "banned" member was the subject of an organized baiting campaign, not that the presumed "victim" is always the model of temperate response.
Well, IMHO that particular "victim" richly deserved being bounced!
He was another of those cowards who dings from hiding, not man enough to take responsibility for what he does.
Although I will admit that, so far as I know, he hasn't stooped to hiding behind someone else's handle, so I suppose he's not
all bad.