Originally Posted by
FlyPointyEnd
Uuummm, okay....but you might want to check your article last April about
CX255 that got diverted. I recall you didn't even cite FT as source until you we're called out.
[My apologies to the mods if this is OT]
This has a lot of backstory: but in short - sure, the poster made remarks on FT. I don't take his word for it persay. It has to be checked and verified. So I contacted him directly for details, eyewitness statements and photos etc which be passed on. I could not help the fact the poster gave me the same FT statement. Since I reached out to him directly, I did not need to cite FT.