Originally Posted by littletiger

I assume you talk about RASK. FX adjusted RASK was down 5.9% in Q3 for IAG (no public data for BA) but FX adjusted CASK was down 5.4%. From investors' point of view, IAG actually did much better than expected in keeping spread relatively constant. LH's FX adjusted RASK was down 6.7% in Q3 while AF's FX adjusted RASK was down 6.5% in Q3. So i would say IAG did much better than AF and LH unless you already see Q4 data that suggests otherwise.