Originally Posted by Dovster
FWAAA, do you realize the damage that such a policy could cause?
If a poster wished to state something negative about someone -- be it Hitler, Bush, Kerry, or the Pope -- he would be required to make his case factually.
It would no longer be enough to misrepresent history and/or current events. "Information" gleaned from extremist right and leftwing websites would have to have their sources identified. In turn, others wishing to debate such information would be forced to provide facts (and sources of facts) to back up what they were saying.
Before long, Omni would turn into an area with intelligent debates, leaving the blind idealogues out in the cold with no place to spew their invectives. This would no longer be the Omni we all know and love!
Interesting. Who decides what is factual or not?