FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - SIN-SFO: A350 3 times more thirsty than 787 ??
Old Dec 7, 2016 | 10:55 am
  #14  
MSPeconomist
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
60 Nights
5M
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Minneapolis: DL DM charter 2.3MM
Programs: A3*Gold, SPG Plat, HyattDiamond, MarriottPP, LHW exAccess, ICI, Raffles Amb, NW PE MM, TWA Gold MM
Posts: 102,617
Originally Posted by Efrem
Aside from the error of ignoring passenger capacity in reaching this conclusion, it also ignores range. The A380 has a range of about 9,700 miles. Both the A350-900 and B787-900 have ranges of about 7,500 miles. The fuel capacity has to be enough for the maximum range. When a longer-range aircraft has a higher fuel capacity, that does NOT mean it burns more fuel per mile. It would usually not load that much fuel for a short flight.
The numbers for net fuel efficiency depend greatly in the length of the route. For very long routes, it requires additional fuel to haul the fuel......
MSPeconomist is offline