"Smacks of censorship" ? You doth protest overmuch.

BA can carry which newspapers it likes, but basely populist piles of lies are supplied cheap enough for BA to want to hand out for free. The Daily Mail can print what it likes, and BA is not obliged to carry it (nor Socialist Worker either, or anything between).

I don't think BA should be giving such a socially damaging pile of hate and lies any platform in their business, and will be telling them so. What's next, Mein Kampf? The current editorial attitude of the Daily Mail is currently somewhere right of Enoch Powell and heading well into NSDAP territory.