FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Qantas (illegally?) attempting to limit compensation for lost baggage
Old Nov 1, 2016 | 12:39 am
  #11  
Dave Noble
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
40 Countries Visited
3M
All eyes on you!
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 46,100
Originally Posted by docbert
Article 27 — Freedom to Contract

You have broken the contract of carriage of the airline, which seems pretty clear-cut to me that they could deny liability.

What's interesting is that whilst most airlines will deny coverage for things like electronics in checked luggage, most don't spell it out as being an actual exclusion as per what's you've quoted.
The airline cannot choose to exclude itself from its legal liability

Article 27 only states

Nothing contained in this Convention shall prevent the carrier from refusing to enter into any contract of carriage, from waiving any defences available under the Convention, or from laying down conditions which do not conflict with the provisions of this Convention.

trying to exclude liability for items in luggage, seems to conflight with the provisions of the convention - if there was damage to poorly packed items, then that is one thing, but in this case the airline lost the case. What was contained in the case is not impacted by the fact that it was the case that it lost.
Dave Noble is offline