FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - The 10,000 foot question
View Single Post
Old Oct 13, 2016 | 6:17 am
  #6  
84fiero
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: South Park, CO
Programs: Tegridy Elite
Posts: 5,677
10,000 feet wasn't an entirely arbitrary choice for the sterile cockpit rule. That altitude (as noted above, pressure altitude above MSL) corresponds with other FAR requirements, such as the requirement for use of supplemental oxygen in unpressurized aircraft (for periods >30 minutes above 10K - goes to full time use above 12K), airspeed restrictions, and others.

There is a general logic as well. Generally, it's more likely that an aircraft, especially a commercial airliner, is engaged in more critical flight operations at lower altitudes as opposed to cruise flight. Obviously the closer an aircraft is to the ground the less margin for error and recovery. And below 10,000 MSL is where the majority of general aviation occurs, much of which is under visual flight rules - hence there is more traffic that isn't under positive control which pilots must be more keen to see and avoid.

Could the FAA have chosen 9,000 feet or 11,000 feet? Sure - freeway speed limits could be 68 or 73 MPH, too, but at some point you have to pick something reasonable and go with it. MSL altitude is used because that's what pilots are using as a reference to operate the aircraft at those altitudes. Yes, it does result in the height above ground level being lower above Denver than above Miami, but presumably it was determined that 10K MSL was still sufficient across US airports.
84fiero is offline