Being that CX is already more than likely to reconfigure their B77Ws to 10 abreast Y, maybe perhaps they should follow PR's configuration? Their B77Ws are 10 abreast with 18 inches and 33 inches pitch. BA currently has 9 abreast Y with only 17 inches width as well as having 31 inches pitch which makes an 8 hour TATL flight bearable but can't imagine what it'll be like for 8 hours or more. Maybe CX can still go 10 abreast Y but maybe if they follow PR (as per seat guru but correct me if I'm wrong).

It's such a shame that my favourite airline is turning to the worse. Maybe I should switch to SQ, OZ, KE, JL or even MH for flights to the Far East. I tend to avoid the ME3 airline die to some long lay overs on some connecting flights.