Originally Posted by
Mark_T
Your description of the events reads somewhat hyperbolic and the FA motivation could be anything including simply making sure the passenger who had not interacted with her at all, had not been 'allowed' to eat his meal etc. was in fact OK...
I agree, sounds a bit exaggerated to me. Don't forget, too, the increased awareness of child slavery/trafficking. In those situations, the trafficked child is severely restricted from interaction with others. Perhaps FA has a family member who was a victim. You never know.
Bottom line? It happened. Yes, it probably was a suboptimal interaction with the cabin crew. But she may have been insistent for a reason.