Originally Posted by
vuittonsofstyle
You are right, Kage. The phrase Amanjunkie was always meant to be ironic.
AZ and team never advertised. They knew that their Amanjunkies would do it for them and introduce like-minded people to the resorts. They also did very little PR. It was always a word of mouth thing.
The Amanjunkie t-shirts were never intended to be true status symbols. Once again, they were meant to be ironic. In the early days of Amanresorts, a sense of humour was prevalent amongst many of the GMs - Anthony Lark (Australian), Guy Heywood (Australian), François Richli (British/French), Henry & Char Gray (British/Canadian).
Sometimes, people from other countries take offence at the often cynical/satirical British sense of humour (and Australian for that matter). I recall that whole episode with Amanda Hyndman and was bemused that many were offended by her comments.
1988...even the first pavilion guests felt as though they were, somehow, making history, just by being there. They knew that Amanpuri would change the face of hotel-keeping.
Lifelong friends were made that Christmas/New Year and many of the guests returned the following year, and the year after, and the year after, and now, in some cases, 28 years later. These days they would call it networking. In those days, it was just a bunch of Amanjunkies getting together at one of their favourite places.
great post as always
vuittonsofstyle. i would imagine britain also had less/different historical use of "junkie" - britain never had a "war on drugs" as far as i know.
when was first Amanjunkie shirt?
it says a lot about aman that they had the shirts made, and also did not use it as publicity campaign. as aman continued opening properties, they primarily owned. (kind of like Peninsula.) seems Canyon Equity was their first partner, starting with Le Melezin.
aman avoided "paid media" and did not have PR firm in US until after DLF acquisition.
re some owners not caring about profits (chains will be less interested) >
"The family did not seek profitability, attached to a demanding lifestyle where everything was done to receive guests as friends, even if it was very expensive,"
«La famille ne cherchait pas la rentabilité, attachée à un art de vivre exigeant où tout était fait pour recevoir des clients comme des amis, même si cela devait coûter très cher»
lefigaro.fr/voyages/2015/12/22/30003-20151222ARTFIG00184-chalet-du-mont-d-arbois-et-rothschild-crea-megeve8230.php