Originally Posted by
Adam1222
I'm not a Gary fan, I am a lawyer; I generally agree that AA shouldn't be liable in tort based on the information we have.
This isn't throwing anyone under the bus. The reality is (nor should it be) that being a molested little girl doesn't de facto make a legal claim against every conceivable entity.
I think it's reasonable to let a court examine the facts and determine liability.
But I suppose that such a reasonable notion would not make for a blog post that would generate many views.