When I read the original post, I thought it was just the original poster expressing his personal opinion that it was inappropriate for a former exotic dancer to be employed in security.

An opinion I would disagree with.

But when I did a news search, the articles phrased things just like the original poster.

How does the media justify this attitude? If a former exotic dancer obtains training in security, what could it possibly matter what her former employment was? It is incredibly two-faced any hypocritical for society to enjoy the services of young women and then not let them happily move on to other lines of work.

Even for those that don't approve of sex- related work, it is equally inappropriate for them to not allow the lady to move on to other employment without continued hassling regarding the past.

The original posts doesn't bother me, but the tone of the articles do.