--- And it's why I'm in favor of no state-imposed security, or, if the airline feels like covering their hineys, completely privatized security.
Consumers can choose to fly on the plane with no security if they so desire, or if they are okay with giving up some of their freedoms in exchange for making someone else primarily responsible for their safety, they can fly on the planes with security. Customers flying to states with reciprocity could carry on the plane, if they had a permit to do so.
We still have this freedom in the charter market at least. Have there been any terrorism-related accidents on charter flights?
[This message has been edited by swise (edited 10-21-2003).]