I will always argue the point that we need better security. In most US airports now that have TSA screeners are not better security but a window dressing to make people feel better. At some airports like ours, which is run completely by ex-military and ex-DEA, we run a much tighter ship which has no window dressing at all. We are 100% security and 100% professional. We can use common sense to a point but we occasionally have a supervisor on a power trip who wants to overrule everything to try to make a name for themselves (Usually a bad name). I have been to only a few other airports (ATL, FLL and MCO) and just from those few I recommended that every airport should be retrained. Longer, harder and better. I personally feel we need security like they have overseas. They've done it for years and have implemented the rules we are just now starting many years ago. And they have prevented terrorist attacks. Honestly though, I do not want to spend the rest of my years screening passengers for the TSA. My personal goal was to get into the government system get probation period out of the way and transfer to another agency....Preferably FBI or DEA. It's actually starting to get redundant to argue for TSA. Why take up for something that gives reasons to question its existance in the first place? my 2 cents anyways.