whine whine whine..that's all you folks know how to do. I'm assuming spiff that you are a business person with no direct experience in criminal/legal/security issues. Maybe business people are the problem here, not "stupid" security measures as you put it. The only ones I see/hear whining about "stupid" security are the business people, not the students, not the blue collar folks, not the 90% of people that keep the airlines affloat. I say we do what East Jersey state prison did years ago (and probably still does), you refuse to be searched when entering the premises, you turn around and go home. Frankly i'm more worried about some drunk businessman hitting a gate agent than I am about a prisoner attacking me when doing field work. Don't tell me the two don't correlate either, because they are both secure environments, risks associate with each. Let's face it spiff, you don't have to fly anywhere, you can tele-commute until your blue in the face. I'm guessing you have a laptop and a wireless connection. Do us all a favor, USE IT.
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Spiff:
I'm not going to stop flying either and I'll probably log approx 5x the miles you will. I am not going to stop my fight against being harassed. The "security" procedures in place right now are largely stupid. I am not going to tolerate stupidity and I am not going to put up with being needlessly harassed. And it's not about hating securit but being willing to sue. Many of the people complaining about these asinine security procedures are willing to accept some risk in their lives. Ironically, removing many of the stupid "security" directives will not increase that risk at all. The crap that passes for security is definitely not "necessary to make sure that plane arrives in once piece."
</font>