What a bizarre journey we're on. Is this a desperate bid for attention? Why reveal nothing but allegations designed to shine the OP in an unfavourable light, while declining to illuminate your own position? How could anybody offer advice/sympathy/assistance in the absence of any context? What then, are we supposed to do? Commiserate based upon a edited letter?

Initially I thought withholding your position may be due to discretion regarding ongoing legal action, but the very existence of and continued participation in the conversation - to the extent that portions of the OP's lawyer's remarks were provided - renders that moot.

What's with the surrogate spokesman offering unsolicited moos? Let the OP speak for the OP.

Perhaps the best course for those of us who don't sit next to each other for 150 segments is to simply bow out of the thread. Maybe when there is a proper, two-sided and coherent debate, we can weigh in and offer that advice/sympathy/assistance or whatever the OP is seeking. Until then, we're just witness to a strange, labyrinthine confused situation that makes little sense and deserves less attention.

OP, let us know when you have an actual concrete position to share. Don't be shy to smother us in facts. Until then, we non-ruminants can't properly comment.

In your first post, you asked us to guess why your status is in jeopardy. We played along for 19 pages and half a year so far. Now many of us are tired of this poorly designed game.

Time to get off the bench or hit the locker room.