Originally Posted by
FlyingJoy
All I am seeking from the forum is some reassurance (or the contrary) that I'm correct in saying that OZ, not TK, is the better choice for me; I'm having a little difficulty making my final choice between the two.
If all you need is maintain status, TK is arguably better since you can keep *G with either 25k miles in one year OR 37.5k miles in two years, either threshold being significantly lower than 40k every 2 years on OZ.
There is of course the lure of lifetime *G on OZ, but as it's been said many times on this board you can't be 100% sure that OZ's program will be unchanged for 10 years or more.