Big4Flyer

While that's a nice sentiment, its not very practical. Maybe there should be no price for your child, but there is. Right now, the safest car for children is the Volvo XC90 SUV. Using your logic, despite a starting price of $44,000 anyone who says their children have no price should own that car, otherwise, if you were driving your family Corolla and you were in an accident, you could never live with yourself, knowing that the Volvo might have prevented it. Actually, as a matter of fact, you should never let your child drive in a car at all, knowing if they get killed in an accident you could never live with yourself knowing that you let them get in the car that day. Using the logic that there is no price for your child, you should be willing to pay for a police escort anytime you drive anywhere with your children to reduce the risk of them being in an accident, is that correct? If you wouldn't be willing to pay for that, then aren't you essentially saying that the cost is more than the risk of something happening?