FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - LAX-ICN on J
Thread: LAX-ICN on J
View Single Post
Old Apr 25, 2016 | 8:46 am
  #14  
MrCUBS
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SAN
Programs: UA 1K, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott Lt Plt
Posts: 242
Originally Posted by radiowell
If you are in J, take the nonstop for a simple reason - more sleep time! NRT-LAX flights are often 9 hours or less, gate to gate.

https://flightaware.com/live/flight/UAL33

Of course, this is reverse, but the same argument applies.
Originally Posted by dvs7310
If you need the additional PQMs then NH would be my choice. If you don't really need them then OZ. I agree, I'd go for the A380 over the 777 if the time works for you.
Originally Posted by LAX/HKG
Agree with others if the time works for you OZ on the A380 is the best option.

If miles is not too important then OZ on the 777, otherwise NH. I personally prefer NH's hard and soft products, but OZ's is pretty decent.

Unless your company requires you to fly on an US based airline UA should be your last option.
The only reason I would be doing NH/UA is for the additional PQM. But based on all the comments, this is not the best option. The extra miles are good, but probably not worth the stop in SFO/NRT, especially on UA
MrCUBS is offline