FliesWay2Much,
I think that's almost giving them too much credit. In my limited experience, the guy was clueless and taking forever. He wouldn't have been able to catch
anything.
But I'm stuck on the idea that behavior detection questions are a form of screening, and this screening is taking place before the TSA has jurisdiction.
I agree with you that the behavior detection officer is far more likely to catch someone with a problem unrelated to aviation safety... if the officer catches anyone at all.
We've known for decades that behavioral techniques don't work.
Have a look at Kraut & Poe's landmark study from 1980:
http://kraut.hciresearch.org/sites/k...nJudgments.pdf
This was a mock customs inspection in which travellers were given fake contraband, and judgments of their behavior were made by customs inspectors versus "laymen." Behavior predicted if a passenger would be
searched, not that he or she was carrying contraband:
Both customs inspectors and laymen were
inaccurate at judging when a traveler was
carrying contraband, when accuracy is the
Pearson correlation between travelers' carrying
of contraband and judges' mean decision to
search them. The correlation over all judges
was -.22 (p< .10) and was -.25 for lay
judges (p < .05) and —.14 for customs inspectors
(p < .10). The negative correlation
indicates that judges were less likely to search
a traveler carrying contraband.