Originally Posted by
ericgdukie44
Edited to add: In the present case, there is no way in a million years a that John Oliver can be found liable for libel. They have to show "actual malice" which is a legal term of art but essentially means he knew it was false or recklessly disregarded whether or not it was true before saying it (and it must meet the other tests listed above). It really is difficult to sue somebody for libel and win if you are a public person/corporation.
Are you sure that
Sullivan malice is necessarily the requisite showing? Not my specialty, but I'd be a little surprised if public corporations are always "public figures" for purposes of defamation law.