FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - WHY HAVE SUBGROUPS???????????????
View Single Post
Old May 8, 2003 | 6:53 am
  #28  
Sweet Willie
Moderator: CommunityBuzz!, OMNI, OMNI/PR, and OMNI/Games & FlyerTalk Evangelist
Conversation Starter
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: ORD (MDW stinks)
Programs: UAMM, AAMM & ExPlat, Hyatt Globalist, Marriott lifetime Plat, IHG Plat, Hilton Diamond
Posts: 24,156
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by Patron:
FlyerTalk is a much more valuable resource if topics are properly categorized and archived.</font>
Agreed, if this is not the case why have any forums, just one massive one? I feel it would be overwhelming, way too much information.

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Moving threads is not popular among posters; I completely agree, that posts should be in the right place, but to move a thread to a place with very low traffic cannot be the best choice.</font>
That is the key for me, "place with a very low traffic count". Why does the forum have low traffic count?

I believe that there has not been proactive education of the subgroups and moving of posts by FT staff, hence the complacency w/posting wherever one feels they wish to post.

Chexfan above has some neat ideas on condensing the Travel forum into more macro groups so the post count would be much higher, response rate much higher, etc.

The FT staff arranged the new Travel Forum to have subgroups, obviously done for a reason. A guess of mine would be that it is expected that FT’ers will use the subgroups.
Sweet Willie is offline