FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Current netbook alternatives
View Single Post
Old Feb 25, 2016 | 12:11 am
  #45  
nkedel
FlyerTalk Evangelist
30 Countries Visited
2M
All eyes on you!
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: in the vicinity of SFO
Programs: AA 2MM (LT-PLT, PPro for this year)
Posts: 19,784
Originally Posted by javabytes
Celeron and Atom are brand names. A Celeron J1900 is not an Atom processor. It's a Celeron processor.
Atom is also used as a generic term for a family of cores mostly used in Atom processors. The present generation of Celerons combine a mix of Atom-based (Bay Trail/Brawell/Airmont/Cherry Trail, etc) and Core-based (Haswell/Broadwell/Skylake) cores.

The J1900 is based on the Bay Trail core, which is a generation-back core also shared with the Atom processors. It's a quad-core, and actually almost decent -- the Bay Trail and newer Atoms are out-of-order CPUs (like Intel's mainstream processors since the Pentium Pro, but unlike the original Pentium and older Atom chips/)

The Celeron badge is enough reason to look elsewhere.
Just depends on the cost vs. performance balance; the J1900 is a great chip if your goal is to put together a sub-$150 new desktop as say, a media player or for embedded use, or as the core of a NAS. It's almost tolerable for light general use.

As chx1975 noted, the Core-based dual-core Celerons are actually halfway decent; I wouldn't buy one in a laptop (in general, I recommend nothing less than a U-series i5), but the newer-generation desktop ones have higher clock rates and are perfectly tolerable for general use.
nkedel is offline