Originally Posted by
Widgets
I'm not saying Delta is right-sizing CVG to stop pro-union employees from organizing.
I'm saying that it looks better to slowly get CVG's numbers down over 6 years (retirements and transfers out while not hiring in) than it does to gut CVG immediately and much more harshly 6 years ago. The ongoing action makes Delta look as pro-labor as an un-unionized company can be. Delta held off lay-offs, encouraged benefitted retirement, is giving preference to impacted employees for transfers, and is offering to help impacted employees relocate easily.
I hear occasional talk about unions from airport customer service, flight attendants, and pilots, but I've never heard pro-union ACS conversations--just FAs and pilots. I'm not saying some ACS people want to be unionized; I'm just saying that I bet any effort by the IAM would fail miserably in today's culture. When the IAM tried getting the FAs onboard last year, I began noticing subtle (and blunt) marketing toward ACS employees against unions. I think Delta's being successful so far at keeping unions away from ACS. Whether I think that's good or bad, I won't say.
They DID do significant reductions 6 years ago. If you do a search you will see they laid-off 800+ when they reduced CVG down to about 170 daily flights back in 2010. Obviously, there have been additional flight cut backs since that time. So they likely went from being slightly overstaffed back then, to more significantly so more recently and didn't see the natural attrition they were expecting to. Seems to me you are trying to read way too much into this. The cuts are rather modest compared to past staffing cutbacks.