Originally Posted by
JDiver
Four agents, four stories. At least three made crAAp up and didn't bother looking up policy.
With the Extra Seat I doubt the FA would enforce which seat the cat resides in front of.
A new low may have been reached!
update:
no, that was not a new low.
This is the new low: AA emailed back and stated that even if she pays for
an extras seat(with real money, not miles) for the cat in a small cat carrier
under the seat in front of the purchased empty seat, she will still have to
pay the pet fee of $250.
Am I the only one who thinks that's wrong? Where is AA's common sense?
