Originally Posted by
fly18725
.
I understand it's easy to read a pointed question and think the analyst has an ulterior motive to influence the airline's management. The thing is, neither party has anything to gain from that.
So, to summarize: analysts don't run the show.
Mr Keay's question to Mr Munoz, although awkwardly phrased, didnt seem to me to have an ulterior motive. As a matter of fact, he was rather straightforward-will you commit to returning money to the shareholders for 2016 versus investing that cash in the enterprise to improve future prospects?
Fortunately it appears that Mr Munoz has a vision for UAL beyond 90 days.