Originally Posted by
DLATL777
I get a kick out of the fact that everyone is missing my point regarding "Waste". A plane meant to fly 17 hours nonstop doing 3x as many landings and substantially more wear and tear just to run cargo is not an ideal use of the 777-200LR. Cargo is not the main reason for this aircraft-range is. Equal cargo capacity on non specifically built LONG RANGE aircraft 777-200/A330-200/A330-300/etc.
But they were "forced" out of DXB and are going to use the AC on a more profitable route.