Originally Posted by
YYC009
The pax traveling YYC-ORD/DEN/SFO are flying on UA the whole way... not on AC. YYC-EWR on AC cnx EWR-XXX on US/OAL is the issue being raised. Why would AC want to funnel pax through EWR when they can do so via YYZ/YUL and keep all the revenue?
True, except I was responding to
adam.smith who was referencing a desire for Star Alliance one-stop travel to Europe and what he perceived to be his limited options. I was pointing out that ORD and DEN (and SFO) are also viable star alliance options for getting to Europe with one stop.
(and just for the record, one isn't limited to UA for the overseas portion from those US gateways.)