FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Why not a compromise with "use it or lose it:"...
Old Sep 7, 2002 | 10:50 am
  #4  
anonplz
A FlyerTalk Posting Legend
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
20 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 44,555
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by zrs70:
Only the lowest fares will be "use it or lose it"</font>
Personally, I can't afford to throw away $200 or $300 here and there every couple of months. Therefore, if I were considering purchasing a use-it-or-lose-it air ticket, I would ask myself several things:

1) Will I HAVE to fly? In the case of Boston, DC, Philly, and even Montreal, the answer may be that driving, Greyhound and Amtrak all provide reasonable alternatives, and thus, I do not need to purchase use-it-or-lose-it tickets.

2) If I MUST fly there, do I have a choice of different airlines? Southwest and JetBlue don't fly everywhere, so it's possible that if I MUST go, use-it-or-lose-it is my only option. In that case, I would go back to square one and ask myself if I REALLY want/need to go, or if I can substitute somewhere closer to home.

3) Finally, If I DO have a variety of options, what are they? Effectively, AirTran is NOT an option. American is not an option, albeit for a different reason. I have United miles, so they are a good choice. Delta, as well. But I really like Southwest's safety record. Not only that, but they are VERY user friendly as to re-using tickets, no change fees, and also, affordable. It would be really tough for me to purchase a use-it-or-lose-it ticket when SouthWest and JetBlue are more accommodating.

I'm just one person, but restricting these tickets is just going to push them all faster into bankruptcy, I'm afraid.
anonplz is offline