FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Feds have refused Air Canada request to cover part of $100M sky marshal cost
Old Nov 23, 2015 | 7:35 pm
  #56  
Transpacificflyer
1M
40 Countries Visited
80 Nights
10 Years on Site
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: BKK/YYZ/YUL
Programs: DL, AC SE, Bonvoy, Centara, Hyatt
Posts: 3,214
Originally Posted by Shareholder
This is a rather expensive way (and I don't mean AC's and WS's foregone revenue from not being able to sell a seat, or having to bump someone) of handling difficult passengers. Such incidents happen from time to time and are dealt with by crew and passengers. There's no need for an armed RCMP undercover officer on these or any flights. Crews have been trained on how to restrain such unruly passengers. As for "weapons" I suppose a cork screw could be deadly, though I've noticed on wide bodies AC uses those mounted devices, and increasingly wines are coming in screw top bottles. And yes, J class metal knives have been back for years, but nobody's been attacked with one. As for coffee pots, suppose that's one of the reasons FAs don't like us to hang around the galley waiting to use the washroom.

Much has changed since Air Marshal's were put back on planes after 9.11. It's like maintaining land lines when cell phones have pretty much usurped their purpose for the most part. And as I've noted earlier, flight decks are now secured with hardened locked doors, and ground screening is many more times improved (for all its theatre) since 9.11 . Air Marshals were introduced as a valid inflight protection when none of this was the norm. Such security starts well before getting to the airport, or even through security screening.
Crews have been trained on how to restrain such unruly passengers
Are you serious? Open your eyes. The FAs do not undergo close quarters combat training. The training they receive is minimal and is not intended for physical confrontations. With a demographic skewed to older females who are not in the prime of their lives, do you really believe this additional expanded responsibility is a reasonable expectation? And just so that we have this clear, you expect the FAs to be trained in safely evacuating an aircraft, hand to hand combat, to serve you drinks with warm nuts and to prepare and serve your meals? Dream on. Not going to happen.
One other item that you forget is that the FAs do not want the responsibility.
Transpacificflyer is offline