FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - When does achieving EK status make sense?
Old Nov 17, 2015 | 4:44 am
  #9  
skywardhunter
10 Countries Visited20 Countries Visited30 Countries Visited5 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Economy, mostly :(
Programs: Skywards Gold
Posts: 7,791
Originally Posted by eternaltransit
Maybe I'm old fashioned, but surely status should be a function your travel pattern, rather than achieving status as a goal?

In other words, I think you will have a better time if you choose your carrier depending on your routes, budget, product and schedule. After all if you fly J or F, status doesn't get you much - you already have the premium amenities that status gets you over Y.

If you are flying Y enough to gain status, then I think the priority would be on choosing the best Y product out there for your needs (i.e. seats/IFE/transfer experience if any/flight time). Minimising your time in Y or making sure that Y is at least tolerable for your many hours and many trips in Y surely takes priority over getting a shiny card?

So to answer your question: it never makes sense to achieve EK status per se, but is most beneficial if you travel in Y often (transit or no transit, because the major benefit is lounge access and priority boarding). However, this is no different to every other FFP out there.
Agreed, that you should select the carrier based on what is most convenient to you, depending on a variety of factors. That's why I've decided to commit to EK and play the status game, because it's also the best route in terms of timing, duration and convenience (though almost never cost).
skywardhunter is offline