Originally Posted by
Fanjet
Since AA's SWUs can be used on any fare, I'll take a fewer amount of them as opposed to having to play upgrade roulette with a higher fare purchase.
This is true until you run out of SWUs. All things considered equal (i.e., upgrading from the lowest possible Y fare), UA's W-fare roulette becomes a better value at the third long-haul trip. With AA, you would have to decide whether to tough it out in Y or spring for J (assuming that you haven't earned additional SWUs at that point). It's also noteworthy that AA doesn't have the equivalent of RPUs. For me, that limits my options for upgrading LAX-JFK and -Hawaii to stickers only--not good for blood pressure!

(I know, I can also use miles, but I think my point is clear.)
Originally Posted by
lazard
That has more to do with the partners than AA. At least they're not like SQ and block partner redemptions.
Originally Posted by
Mwenenzi
That is little to nothing to do with AA but more with the partner airline who makes the awards available (or not available)...
When I referred to AA's lousy award redemption, I was thinking of both AA and OW partners. But let's just talk about AA. IMO it's not an understatement to say that AA is stingy--especially in comparison to UA. I mainly redeem transpac awards for my family, so I'll limit my comment to AA's U.S.-NRT/PEK/PVG/HKG routes. Other than DFW-HKG, which has heavy loads (although I doubt it's profitable, but that's OT), it's still very difficult to find award space on those other routes unless you plan wAAy early or just days prior to departure.