Originally Posted by
jfunk138
What other airports utilize "reverse" screening?
http://www.heraldandnews.com/news/lo...b2fba7d68.html
Some interesting counter material for the sheep that believe we need to screen passengers on all commercial aircraft to protect the non-flying public on the ground from a 9/11 style attack.
I would think a 25,000 lb turboprop carrying 500+ gallons of fuel is still very much a "flying missile".
So please outline the alternative. Let's stop screening people so you can just bring handguns onto planes.
Perhaps instead of just whining about things you can outline what should be changed and then dig into the counterarguments of those changes.