FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - Is Frontier airlines worth it?
View Single Post
Old Oct 14, 2015 | 8:07 am
  #43  
iahphx
FlyerTalk Evangelist
10 Countries Visited
20 Countries Visited
30 Countries Visited
25 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 18,230
Originally Posted by rtalk25
I believe the aggressive fare matching is being spearheaded by AA, led really by pmUS.

. . . .

I have no idea if F9 and NK will succeed when competing against an aggressive AA, atleast in PHL. They have the fallback of using alternate airports. The same might not be true in ATL ORD, etc. but atleast those stations are mid-continent oriented that F9 and NK should coordinate connections through them, when fare matching is intense.
Yeah, this is a very interesting dynamic. Doug Parker (and his right-hand man, Scott Kirby) have proven to be extremely successful competing against low fare carriers. They seem to have a carefully crafted strategy to drive them from their hubs -- or at least "persuade" them from expanding.

My guess is the strategy will work, because the only reason to fly Spirit/Frontier is if you really want to fly somewhere, but the cost is prohibitive on the "regular" airlines. If the savings aren't substantial, no one of sound mind would fly Spirit/Frontier.

I think Spirit/Frontier already operate at a huge disadvantage because they get almost none of the high paying business fares that "subsidize" the operation of the legacy carriers. So Spirit/Frontier already operate at a huge unit revenue disadvantage. Sure, they can operate at lower cost, but everyone has to buy airplanes and fuel. If the legacies prevent Spirit/Frontier from selling anything more than $49 fares, I don't see how they can cover their costs.
iahphx is offline