Originally Posted by
jlb3
Just because you don't want to stay there doesn't mean it should be banished from the MR portfolio, prohibiting others from enjoying the 10 min walk to the main gate of Disneyland . . . .
It shouldn't necessarily get banished from the MR portfolio, but it should rebranded. The question is, to what? Does Marriott have
any existing brand that it would fit in? In my mind, it doesn't fit in the Fairfield brand at all if it doesn't have the complimentary breakfast. I'd banish it to the Courtyard brand (though if it has 0% on-site dining options it probably doesn't quite fit there either), since that's the MR brand favored by people who don't care about a complimentary breakfast.