Originally Posted by
kevanyalowitz
TI see this as yet another move by an ineffective management team to reduce services highly valued by HVFs in an effort to save a dime. In doing so, they will further alienate their best customers, and be left with less revenue. The net-net will be a dime saved, and a dollar lost.
Spot on. This smells like a desperate move by management that knows it's being propped up by cheap oil and a peaking US economy.
Originally Posted by
JBord
Allowing good employees to work from home at the same pay is a win-win. .
But UA isn't "allowing" its employees to work at home, it's forcing them to.
I personally don't like working at home. I like personal interaction with my co-workers and feeling like I'm a part of something.
And let's be clear, the "work at home" option is being forced on the employees, as is the pay cut. This is anything but a pro-employee move.