Originally Posted by
Erasmus
Because this way the OP doesn't get the benefits of DM in the year he earned the MQMs (presuming he was not already DM from the previous year). ...
I got that. But the period of time is not a year, it will be from when he hit DM in year 1 (almost certainly late for a normal PM) until early year 2. And this is very likely only a few months. And a period of time in which he would fly 25K.
So not a year, more like a quarter year. And he is risking the DM status on all year 3 (which he would have had w/o the spend) if the refund play fails.
To be clear:
. OP strategy works: DM late year 1 till Feb Year 4.
. OP strategy fails because "spend" does not clawback: DM late year 1 till Feb year 3
. OP never hits spend exemption: DM early year 2 till Feb year 4
So he is risking losing about 3/4 year status to garner an extra 1/4 year. And that seams like a bad play considering how possible it is DL/Amex wil catch on.
Also, if his strategy fails he enters year 3 with 50k less carry than with either other strategy.