FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - AT+T vs. Sprint Cell Coverage
View Single Post
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:44 pm
  #7  
CrazyOne
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, Earth (PIT)
Programs: Airline/TSA Avoidance Platinum, Hotel Disloyalty Silver, Hertz 1.7*
Posts: 5,277
<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Originally posted by mspguy:
So.....it sounds like that Sprint isn't any better than AT+T? Meaning they both have pluses/minus’s with no one being the far and above winner when it comes to domestic usa coverage. Sounds like I should stay with my AT+T nationwide digital phone service.</font>
No, no clear winner. Generally every metro area has it's winners and losers. Sprint and T-Mobile have worked well here for me, for instance. Verizon is the only one I would think might have a slight edge, but I'm still not sure it's that compelling. When you're talking about no signal in a rural area, there's no guarantee it will be better with another provider unless you mean one specific rural area and can track down the exact network coverage for that spot. If you mean various areas, switching probably won't help.
CrazyOne is offline