FlyerTalk Forums - View Single Post - CX To Use 350 On AKL?
View Single Post
Old Jun 17, 2015 | 7:19 pm
  #10  
QRC3288
All eyes on you!
15 Years on Site
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Programs: CX, UA, Shangri-La, Hyatt, Starwood
Posts: 8,200
Originally Posted by fakecd
sorry but if you meant Jet Airways and Air India is a competition to CX, I guess I have nothing to say... but if you meant indirect flights i wonder if that's a direct comparison being direct vs connecting routes.
man, what you recommend would be brutal....canning Cirrus J on the India flights. I really hope CX doesn't take you up on this idea. The ex-India flights (DEL, BOM, HYD, MAA) all have red-eyes back to HKG, and are significantly longer than any other red-eye without Cirrus J guaranteed (SIN, KIX, NRT, ICN). Particularly BOM. That's like a 5-6 hour flight.

I absolutely hate red-eyes without a bed, and pretty much avoid them at all costs. I don't fly to India that often, but if this transpired I'd just fly Jet Airways back on my next India trip (Air India...terrifies me).

Haven't used Jet before, but colleagues tell me the product in Premiere Class is nice, and Jet has it on the A330-200 they serve to HKG. Plus it's reverse herringbone but only has 3 across in the A330 (vs 4 for CX)...so it sounds like they're flying CX's 77W Cirrus equivalent on the A330. Sweet. Flying back, I really could care less if the food sucks or service is horrible or whatever else. I can just put on the eye shades, pop an Ambien if absolutely necessary and get 3-4 hours of sleep in a flat bed. As long as there aren't shrieking children or a party going on in the cabin, it should do the trick.
QRC3288 is online now