Originally Posted by
goalie
I still say no to this as TB should take the time, listen to the comments and get the motion right the first time but if something is missed (other than a simple typo), withdraw the motion or have TB members simply vote no to kill the motion and re-do the motion to get it right
Originally Posted by
kipper
As I said in the other thread...
Originally Posted by kipper
If TB is going to draft motions in the private forum, then they really should be read, reviewed, and if necessary, revised before they are officially motioned and seconded.
Originally Posted by kipper
Here's a concept for a well-defined and approved procedure... If it's anything more than fixing a typo, the motion is withdrawn, corrected, and then proposed and seconded again.
Originally Posted by
Doc Savage
Agree. The route proposed in the motion is too circuitous. Any motion in its final form should be subjected to a de novo up or down vote.
I agree with the above three posters.