i agree. having recently come to terms with the fact that i'll be flying y for the next several years (company policy and i'd rather use miles for free tix), i now focus on carriers with good Y products. tg is nice and so is nh, for that matter. i don't eat the food on either, but both win in terms of ife and seat pitch. imo sq and cx, while nice up front, are too tight in the back.

i've had surprisingly good y-class experiences with ca, pr, and mh (not too surprising i guess). i don't like oz, ke, br (except for ED of course), or mu.