Originally Posted by
rjw242
So, bearing in mind that I'm not necessarily defending AA here -- what on earth is this hatchet job? Leading with a statement of fact that flyers are "avoiding" AA, "proving" this with a few anecdotes and misrepresented statistics ("third most complained-about airline" but no context about passenger numbers; below-average satisfaction score but no indication of the significance of this), and then admitting at the end that AA's profits are sky-high so maybe people aren't actually avoiding it?
I don't care a whit about AA's good name or lack thereof, but this article offends my sense of basic reason.
Agree! Really poor journalism. The headline and lead were refuted mid-article but the author then goes back and picks up the original thread as if not. Bad reporting or editing, or both?